Questão nº 143

Questão de Língua Inglesa · CEBRASPE IRBR 2025 (nº 143)

CEBRASPE2025Diplomata (Terceiro Secretário)Língua Inglesa

There is nothing inevitable about choices that are environmentally destructive. In 1800, there were indeed 550 steam engines in Europe but there were over 500,000 water mills. Coal was more expensive than hydro power and many industrialists were not persuaded of its added value. It was the economic recession of 1825-1848 with increasing agitation by textile workers over salaries and conditions which made the use of coal-powered, steam-driven spinning machines a much more attractive proposition. More machines meant fewer workers and fewer workers meant fewer demands, notably for wage rises. Therefore, the substantial increase in CO₂ emissions in Britain in the first half of the nineteenth century, which through economic competition, war and imperial domination would start a worldwide trend, was not the blind outcome of the machinery of ‘progress’ but the cumulative consequence of a set of very specific decisions taken by identifiable socio-economic actors.

Similarly, the notion that ecological awareness is only a very recent phenomenon where “humanity” finally woke up to the environmental consequences of its economic activities does not stand up to scrutiny. In the period from the beginnings of the industrial revolution to the decade when the movement towards fossil fuels use becomes more marked, awareness of the relationships between humans and their environment or the “natural world” was widespread. Environmental risks have been clearly and repeatedly signalled from the time of the industrial revolution onwards. The notion of an unthinking humanity bringing destruction upon itself does not bear up to examination.

In relation to the previous text, judge the items that follow.


In the second paragraph, the expressions “stand up to scrutiny” (first sentence) and “bear up to examination” (last sentence) have similar meanings and may correctly be used interchangeably in the text.

Resposta comentada

Sinonímia é quando duas expressões diferentes dizem a mesma coisa no contexto. Aqui, tanto "stand up to scrutiny" quanto "bear up to examination" significam "resistir a uma análise rigorosa" / "aguentar ser examinado de perto" — ou seja, a ideia sobrevive quando alguém a investiga com cuidado. Trocar uma pela outra não muda o sentido do texto.

  • Correta: Certo. As duas expressões são equivalentes no contexto: ambas afirmam que a tese (de que a consciência ecológica é recente) não resiste a um exame crítico.

Fica de olho: a banca costuma trocar por expressões que parecem sinônimas mas mudam o sentido — por exemplo, substituir "stand up to scrutiny" por "give in to scrutiny" (que significaria ceder à análise, o oposto) ou "bear up to examination" por "bear examination out" (sentido diferente). Sempre confira se a troca mantém a mesma direção de sentido (resistir × ceder), não só o tema parecido.

Fonte: CEBRASPE IRBR 2025 Diplomata (Terceiro Secretário). Reproduzida para fins de estudo.

Continue estudando

Estudar é izi

Pratique milhares de questões como esta, de graça, com explicação e gamificação no Quizinho.

Estudar de graça no Quizinho