Questão nº 130

Questão de Língua Inglesa · CEBRASPE IRBR 2025 (nº 130)

CEBRASPE2025Diplomata (Terceiro Secretário)Língua Inglesa

Diplomacy is often described as an art, involving decisions shaped by sensitive political nuances that require human judgment, cultural understanding, and emotional intelligence — qualities that AI cannot fully replicate. While AI can support decision-making, it may also manipulate human behavior subtly, especially through systems developed in countries with different geopolitical priorities. This deepens the AI divide between technologically advanced and resource-limited nations, embedding linguistic and cultural biases and reinforcing global power asymmetries. As algorithms take their place alongside diplomats, the art of negotiation now meets the science of AI. The future of diplomacy must lie in fostering a symbiotic relationship where AI enhances human expertise, streamlines processes, and offers new strategic tools while leaving the nuanced art of diplomacy in human hands.

Diplomatic institutions adopting such technologies should also adopt guardrails to clarify how these systems inform decision-making. To ensure that AI systems function appropriately across diverse cultural contexts, adaptive and responsible AI frameworks should be integrated into policy discussions at the national and international levels. Crucially, any AI deployment must prioritise human agency. The goal must not be to automate diplomacy, but to augment it. AI’s incorporation into diplomacy offers both promise and peril. While the technology supports efficiency and expands access to information, it must be governed by strong ethical frameworks, particularly when it can shape global power relations through sensitive negotiations. Rather than embracing AI as a magic wand, it must be approached as a double-edged sword that is capable of assisting, but never replacing the unique human skills that diplomacy demands.

Judge the following items based on the ideas presented in the preceding text, as well as on its linguistic aspects.


The author argues that the ethical governance of AI’s application in diplomacy is especially critical because its influence may extend beyond technical efficiency to altering the global distribution of political power.

Resposta comentada

A ideia central é que a IA na diplomacia não é só uma ferramenta técnica de eficiência: ela pode moldar relações de poder entre países, por isso precisa de governança ética (regras claras sobre como a IA é usada e quem responde por ela). O texto diz isso explicitamente ao afirmar que a IA "must be governed by strong ethical frameworks, particularly when it can shape global power relations through sensitive negotiations".

  • Correta: Certo. O texto liga a necessidade de arcabouço ético justamente ao fato de a IA poder reconfigurar relações globais de poder, indo além da mera eficiência técnica.

Fica de olho: a banca costuma trocar "pode influenciar o poder global" por "a IA substitui os diplomatas" ou "a ética é necessária apenas por erros técnicos". Ambas distorcem o texto — ele defende augmentar, não substituir, e o foco ético está no impacto político, não só na falha técnica.

Fonte: CEBRASPE IRBR 2025 Diplomata (Terceiro Secretário). Reproduzida para fins de estudo.

Continue estudando

Estudar é izi

Pratique milhares de questões como esta, de graça, com explicação e gamificação no Quizinho.

Estudar de graça no Quizinho