Questão nº 32
Questão de Língua Inglesa · CESGRANRIO BNDES 01/2024 (nº 32)
Regeneration: Why businesses are moving beyond sustainability and thinking about regrowth
Sustainability is out, regeneration is in. According to a 2019 survey by ReGenFriends, nearly 80% of US consumers prefer “regenerative” brands to “sustainable” brands. Gen Y and Z consumers find the notion of “sustainability” too passive. They want to buy from regenerative businesses that embody and practice the three noble qualities found in all living systems: renewal, restoration and growth. Regeneration goes beyond sustainability by creating a deeper and wider socioeconomic impact.
1
Sustainable brands strive to just do less harm to the planet. Regenerative businesses go beyond sustainability and fight to do more good to society and the planet. Specifically, regenerative firms seek to boost the health and vitality of people, places and the planet simultaneously in a synergistic manner. In doing so, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that regenerative businesses can achieve far better financial performance and impact than their sustainability-focused peers.
2
In the Amazon, we find an example of how regeneration works in practice. The murumuru is a palm tree that grows in the Amazon forest. The Amazon’s indigenous peoples chop this palm tree down and use its wood to produce and sell items such as brooms. As it happens, we can obtain a highly moisturizing butter from the seeds of this palm tree, which is very efficient at repairing and renewing damaged hair. The value of these seeds is seven times greater than that of this palm tree’s wood. As such, people in the Amazon can generate seven times more economic value by preserving the murumuru tree than cutting it. Businesses are taking notice. Natura, a Brazilian cosmetics firm, is collaborating with Amazonian Indigenous people to ethically source murumuru butter for a variety of hair care products, using their traditional farming techniques. This mutually beneficial collaboration means indigenous communities are regenerating themselves and the planet along three complementary dimensions: economic, socio-cultural and environmental.
3
But it’s not just natural ecosystems that can benefit from prioritizing regeneration. Human ecosystems, too, stand to benefit. Regenerative businesses also strive to boost the health and vitality of individuals and communities, especially in aging societies. Take Japan, a country that is aging rapidly. 30% of its population is already over 65. The average life expectancy of its citizens is 84 years. Sadly, longevity doesn’t promise vitality.
4
Meiji Yasuda is Japan’s oldest largest life insurance firm. During Covid-19, the firm realized that its true mission should be to boost people’s vitality rather than protect them from death. In April 2020, the firm launched a 10-year plan to evolve the life insurance firm into a life regeneration company. This strategy calls for prolonging the healthy life expectancy of its clients and vitalizing local communities across Japan where the firm operates. Meiji Yasuda is investing in new partnerships and technologies to promote preventive healthcare in Japan. For instance, it teamed up with the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center in Japan to develop new digital tools that can help its clients anticipate and prevent cardiovascular problems.
5
To get buy-in from internal and external stakeholders, businesses should explain how their triple regeneration strategy – the synergistic revitalization of people, places and the planet – could yield great economic and social value for all stakeholders. Visionary food companies and apparel makers like Danone, General Mills, Eileen Fisher, Illycaffè and Patagonia are investing in regenerative agriculture. They are doing it not only because it drastically reduces water use and emissions, boosts soil fertility and improves animal welfare, but also because it enhances the livelihoods of financially-challenged farmers.
6
Promising place-based economic development initiatives exist in disadvantaged communities across the US that use a holistic approach to regenerate people, places and the biodiversity altogether. By joining these initiatives, businesses can accelerate their own transition to a regenerative model. For instance, Reimagine Appalachia (RI) is a multi-stakeholder coalition that aims to revitalize abandoned coal mines and restore the natural ecosystems in Appalachia. RI is supporting the Appalachian Regional Reforestation Initiative, while also creating jobs and economic opportunities in the region.
7
Given the climate urgency, it is time that businesses think and act beyond sustainability. They must evolve into regenerative businesses that renew, restore and grow people, places and the planet synergistically.
8
In the sentence of paragraph 1 “Regeneration goes beyond sustainability by creating a deeper and wider socioeconomic impact.”, the words “deeper” and “wider” are formed by the addition of a suffix.
The same suffix is found in
- Adelay
- Bwater
- Ctogether
- Dstronger (alternativa correta)
- Ewired
Resposta comentada
Gabarito Alternativa D
Conceito-chave: O sufixo -er tem dois usos principais: forma o comparativo de superioridade de adjetivos curtos (ex.: deep → deeper, wide → wider) e também pode indicar "aquele que faz" (ex.: teach → teacher). Na questão, deeper e wider são comparativos, então a alternativa correta precisa ter o mesmo sufixo com a mesma função.
- (A) Incorreta: Delay é um verbo/substantivo completo, sem sufixo; o "y" final não é sufixo comparativo.
- (B) Incorreta: Water é um substantivo completo; o "er" faz parte da raiz da palavra, não é um sufixo adicionado.
- (C) Incorreta: Together é um advérbio; o "er" aqui não é sufixo, é parte da palavra original (do inglês antigo togædere).
- (D) Correta: Stronger é exatamente o comparativo de strong, formado pelo mesmo sufixo -er de deeper e wider. É o gabarito oficial.
- (E) Incorreta: Wired tem o sufixo -ed (passado/particípio), não o sufixo -er; o "r" é da raiz wire.
A armadilha da banca: A pegadinha está em alternativas como water e together, que terminam com as letras "er", mas não têm o sufixo -er. O aluno desatento olha só a terminação e marca errado. Para não cair, pergunte sempre: "Essa palavra foi formada pela adição de -er a uma palavra-base?" Se a palavra-base não existir sozinha (ex.: wat ou togeth), então não é sufixo, é parte da raiz.
Fonte: CESGRANRIO BNDES 01/2024 Conhecimentos Comuns. Reproduzida para fins de estudo.